The human race has overcome everything but its own insanity. There is no greater puzzle. I unraveled it all.
Instigating events
There is a sequence of events in a man's life that creates the comprehensive denial of the transformative component necessary for sentient ascendance. What could those events possibly be?
In the face of adamant denial, as our sentient awareness became increasingly formidable, hints began to appear. It is obvious that something is wrong. Only what is wrong has remains so obscure.
That which went wrong must also apply to all of the varied reactions, the strange behaviours and quirks of the human race. The quirks observed in the male gender, in particular, must correlate. While the female gender's quirks must be taken into account, it is clearly the male gender's quirks that stand out as particularly disruptive to our state.
That defines the hunt.
Every man is affected. It's just a matter of degree. Not all men go completely mad but, enough do so to upset our existence in a comprehensive manner and leads to the ongoing destructive tendencies of the race.
The events must also answer how and why the realization became so twisted and distorted, hidden beneath heaps of nonsense that have accumulated for millennia. What is the secret that leads to mad obsessions? How and why did it become an obsessive secret?
That refines the hunt.
One of the most bizarre aspects is that the whole of the male gender was able to close ranks on this unreasonable dysfunction without ever saying a word to each other about the subject. It is imprinted on the male gender without a word ever being uttered in the most bizarre manner, leading to such awful effects as the caricature of male that became toxic.
That complicates the hunt.
It has held all of humanity in thrall to the stupour for three millennia, while the prehuman condition became more combative, because it has been so complicated.
All men are so committed, on their own, to avoiding the subject, but so desperate to avoid considering the subject openly that they began to fear anyone that might expose the secret. The disturbance led to a level of distrust throughout the male gender that speaks to paranoia. It is the 'good old boys network' personified and crystallized into its essential form. How did it occur?
Cognitive dissonance
All of this points to a single culprit. Cognitive dissonance.
Cognitive dissonance is a state of mental disarray that occurs when a person holds beliefs or opinions that are inconsistent (with a sentient reality and the desire for clarity).
This defines what happened. Still, how does it occur?
It is a disruption of the mental state of the whole of the male gender that is reinforced nearly daily from puberty on until old age. By then, the damage has become deep and abiding only varying in degree by how the individual coped with the issue at hand (or didn't).
Cognitive dissonance suits the circumstances perfectly. It disrupts beyond just words. It disrupts the thinking process itself, throwing thoughts off into deceits, delusions, excuses, and justifications rather than confront the secret that everyone knows.
It allows for aberrant deceitful thoughts that suppress the most important realizations, reinforces feelings of distrust of 'others', and blinding all and sundry to the secret.
It creates despair as well as delusions of grandeur. It initiated all of the paradigms of nonsense by which we live. It creates an altered state of mind that adapts self-deceits to suit the circumstances of the individual.
It explains all of the quirks, aberrations, and obsessions that consume individual males, as well as the overall bizarre take on life that the male gender displays.
The whole spectrum of reactions of the male gender is explained by cognitive dissonance. It also explains the quirks that many of the female gender adopt through osmosis as it is imprinted on them by the mad antics of the male gender. It leaves room for all of the paradigms of nonsense that have developed.
It also explains the maintenance of the animal's stupour for three millennia as it sidelined the sentient mental facilities.
That still leaves the question of how cognitive dissonance occurs?
Ecstasy stirs the brain to new heights. A most disturbing event occurs during male ecstasy that sets off the cognitive dissonance.
The female does not achieve ecstasy. The man's ecstasy prevents the desire for its conscious consideration.
An act that has not changed significantly for a billion years becomes disappointing for a sentient being that cannot avoid its own heightened awareness of existence. The mind retreats in confusion during the surprising state of ecstasy, never to entirely recover. Instead, it becomes embedded in the subconscious.
For a sentient being, the desire to repeat the experience of ecstasy is tainted by the realization that the woman did not experience the same pleasure. It becomes firmly embedded in the subconscious as it is repeated over a lifetime.
Do you begin to see the contention between the selfish desire to repeat ecstasy and disturbing realization that the woman does not share in the ecstasy? The stunning state of ecstasy for the male shunts all else aside.
The disturbance is compounded by the certainty that there is nothing to be done. The certainty has been in place so long that no one even questions it. Acceptance of failure preceded the more sophisticated realization by the male gender that it is no longer just an animal.
The male's dissonant, haywire reaction to all of life becomes clear. The simultaneous occurrence of ecstasy and failure during coitus derails his sentient clarity.
The male sentient brain goes haywire during the ecstatic event of orgasm when the same ecstasy does not occur for his companion. How does he justify it? He can't, so his consciousness becomes dissonant and the issue becomes entombed.
That leaves only the curious occurrence of the male gender's communal reaction that may be best described as misogyny.
Camaraderie
The camaraderie of the male gender may be described as the circling the wagons to protect the ludicrous secret that only keeps them from realizing their sentient potential for love. How that came about is just as convoluted as the cognitive dissonance that preceded it.
It is based the individual male's misconceived desire to feel like a man and be accepted as a man by others that are putting on the same act. Twisted like a pretzel.
A man wants to 'feel like a man' in the absence of that which distinguishes a man from an animal. In order to do so, he has to feel validated by other men. Because of his cognitive dissonance, he can never validate himself.
He has no idea if any other man is successful at Loving Coitus since he dares not ask (in general, they are not, close to a point approaching unity), so he relies on the appearance of confidence in men and attempts to mimic the same. This created the caricature of male toxicity, aka conman.
They put on an act of confidence just to get by and, thus, join the camaraderie of men that developed specifically for the reason of the secret that no one has been willing to admit. Each and every one of them has been unwilling to admit their own failure and have no confirmation that anyone else fails. So, the comedy of errors continues on and the most arrogant often become role models for no rational reason.
The camaraderie and contrasting isolation (caused by the secret) experienced by each individual man is compounded by the validation by other males that never rings entirely true. It is one of the most bizarre effects of the twisted path that the prehumans have followed. It defines topsy-turvy very well.
How ironic that they have been running away from that which can fulfill the self-respect, while ridding them of their dependence on lies and a toxic caricature that damages all.
The underhanded behaviour that develops to extremes in some herds of prehumans, as they crowd together, are meant to distract from glaring the spotlight on the perceived weakness (which is only a weakness for an animal!). It is all a craven, cowardly act to seek a sense of superiority to compensate for feelings of inferiority.
A Human species, through the strength of fulfilling Loving Coitus, can create Human capabilities to make it more than an animal in every way. Until we do, we remain an animal demented by its sentient capabilities in all ways.
The misogyny that resulted from the false camaraderie is an awful, unintended consequence. It is the defensive stance of a mad gender lashing out in exaggerated sensitivity to any mention, or slightest intimation of their failure, no matter how innocent. It is paranoia seeking the ghosts that it created.
I hope that begins to describe it well enough that some men can begin to counter the insanity.
All of this directs us to the sequence of events, in a man's life and the male gender's increasingly unreasoned state, that creates the bizarre circumstances that have prevented us from obliterating our dystopian, destructive perspective on life.
We can be Human. We just haven't admitted it yet.
The adamant refutation of the problematic nature of the absence of Loving Coitus, and the missing link to its absolute necessity to attain an unrestricted sentient, Human existence, has made it extremely complex to get to the root of it all, since the deceptions have been embellished and reinforced for three millennia with almost every word uttered or written.
Rather than confronting the issue and, finally, succeeding, we buried the problem beneath growing heaps of folderol. We have been hiding from our Humanity.
The strengthening of dissonance over the lifetime of the human race has continued to reinforce the stupour of the animal that remains, becoming more and more violently destructive along the way.
Worse yet, the vaguely conscious awareness as it continued to creep into each generation at a younger age with no known viable recourse, just caused a misdirected rebellion with no discernible target. Until now.
The importance of the win-win scenario of mutual ecstasy is obvious to our sentient awareness, whether we like it or not. The male gender must deal with the calamity caused by its absence during coitus.
The worst results are embodied by those that avoid any compensatory action to fulfill the woman's ecstasy. They take and only take. Or, whine about it (think InCel and Epstein). Those that find some stopgap alternative suffer less, but still suffer.
Men intensely hate the feeling of failure that their own ecstasy interferes with conscious consideration. Conversely, they are driven to keep coming back for more. It describes the cognitive dissonance perfectly and reveals the source of the ongoing stupour and madness.
It did not begin as a secret. It began as something that utterly confounded the male gender and grew to the state of a secret that no one was willing to mention but everyone knew because or sentient comprehension has been delayed so long.
In desperation, the male gender continued to attempt to convince itself that there is nothing to be done. Our increasingly capable sentient awareness has countered that delusion all along. May it now overcome the madness.
