Touching
Sing to the mountains
Sing to the skies
Bursting from fountains
Let river raise tides
The day her drawbridge touches the land
The day she fills the world
When all the love is faintly fanned
The woman's flag unfurled
The day the wonder of her voice
Rings out with no more pain
Is day that life has won its choice
The ending of the rain
The day the voice that ne'er holds back
Is singing, free of heart
Is day in which we find the knack
For chains to fall apart
For whatever reason, I was just stirred to reread Sentience. It really answers everything. It should have been accepted across the board.
I still cringe at all of the typos that the first version contained (all repaired), but it was not so bad as to cause the book to be rejected. It is the stupour. Nothing else.
It took me fifteen books just to realize how deeply disturbed humanity remains and how unwilling humanity is to see through to the truth. What is truly appalling is that humanity would rather continue the destruction of its world and compromise all life on Earth rather than face the truth. It's easier to let the destruction roll on.
All of the later books were my attempts to delve deeper, even in the absence of support. On all fronts, I made further progress as I proceeded. The only one that was really important was the delving into how men can succeed with ease. The rest, while useful to a dimwit, are not really important. Basically, the fourteen further books were attempts to penetrate the stupour as the depths of the stupour became more and more obvious.
I do have to thank the one woman that indirectly responded. I think that gave me heart to complement my stubbornness.
But, really, once one sees it all, there is no going back. I could never really doubt that I was right about it all. It's just so damned obvious, once one sees the truth and refutes the lie that has held our sentience hostage all along. There is no going back. It would be insane to do so.
One thing that threw me as I skimmed through the book. At the very end of the last chapter, I mention the Woman. That was just not possible in the original book because it was another two years before I encountered her. I guess I'm not terribly surprised that, when I edited the book (about twenty edits before i ever published and another twenty after it was published), I had to mention her. But, it initially took me by surprise. I'm glad I did so. She was crucial to my adamancy to carry on.
There's another point worth mentioning. I was driven to write the other books in the face of no reaction to the book. Was I wrong? Was I missing something? My confidence in what I was suggesting was still tentative in the face of such lack of reaction. Over the period of the next ten years and fourteen books, I became convinced beyond the shadow of a doubt. I am right.
This was originally a rant I created in frustration ... the frustration remains.
Premise: Humanity won't be human until men learn to love. Men won't learn to love until they learn to master their bodies.
Evidence:
Sentience, humanity's heightened awareness of existence, is a change of state. It is not just a genetic change. It is not just a new set of clothes. It is a change of awareness of reality which we have yet to fulfill.
Does it take evidence to convince you that our earliest ancestors were dumber than a bag of rocks? That they were more animal than human? That their minds had difficulty accepting the reality that its conscious awareness began to make evident?
Does it surprise you to realize that we continue to follow the lead of beings that could do no more than make excuses?
Our history is riddled with the evidence.
Does it take some great leap of insight to realize that they didn't know what to think regarding the very human dilemma of sentience or the flaw regarding the act of coitus? Look around. We haven't changed at all. What are some of the biggest topics of discussion between the two witless philosophical sides of politics? Our ancestors were an animal trying to figure out a very different human, sentient existence and reality. We still are.
The proof regarding the most important topic is right in front of us. Does the proclamation that men lasting two minutes is good enough while women need more like ten to fifteen minutes to achieve orgasm mean nothing to you? Does the pitiful attempt to use a pill to substitute for what a man should be able to do just because he is sentiently endowed mean nothing to you?
It is right there. It is the evidence that we are continuing to attempt to twist an animal's state of failure to be acceptable by a human, sentient race. No one has ever asked if it is possible to succeed at making coitus a loving event between two highly evolved humans.
I did. It is.
We have accepted the animal's defeat regarding the most important act of life that no sentient race would ever accept. That is the evidence.
Maybe the funniest part is that if some man learned how to succeed, he couldn't share the discovery with anyone because no one wants to admit that they are failing in the first place. No one wants to hear it. Men have been convinced through shame and laziness to never even try and certainly never even broach the subject of loving a woman the way she deserves.
Men have heard it all before, right? You haven't heard this. I put it under a microscope and found that, gee, men can control the actions and reactions of their muscles. It is far less complicated than the brouhaha that men have made out of it.
It's just using your brain and, believe it or not, we all have one. It's already been proven that we can walk, talk, and ride a bike. Anyone of which is more difficult to learn than to learn something simple like the pelvic muscles only attach to the pelvis. They are not involved in any bodily movement and, yet, those pelvic muscles will flex in a man when moving about. They don't need to, but they do. The pelvic muscles are one of the triggers that makes it end all too soon.
Does that not compute? Only if you have had nothing but mutually fulfilling coitus can you refute it. The dumb animal from which we evolved remains; just look around. It hasn't changed ... yet!
We can use our brains but, it seems, we fear to do so. We fear to confront a problem the only way it can be addressed. By thinking. It makes sense. Men have failed for millennia (a billion years before that, others failed; no surprise; they had no awareness, they did as a simple brain would do). So, who could believe that we hadn't turned over every rock already, three millennia later? The realization that everyone before had failed overwhelmed the animal's limited awareness. It has been shunted into the subconscious ever since.
It was beyond our earliest ancestors' scope. It is not beyond ours. Only the legacy of the animal remains in the way. We need to think like sentient humans. We can all learn to love.
Does it take evidence to realize that coitus has been trapped in the animal's witless enactment? That it is only witless acceptance that restrains us from realizing it is easy for a thinking human being to succeed? Does it take evidence to realize that humans require more than the witless rutting of an animal? Both genders suffer as long as coitus remains unfulfilling to a sentient mind? In their stupour, the animal may not care. We do.
Does it take evidence to realize that a man can control his body to such a fine degree that he can make coitus a loving event? We have only blinded ourselves to a sentient reality. Coitus can become a loving event for a human race. In making it so, we become human. Finally.
Does it take evidence to realize that coitus has been trapped in a witless animal's enactment? Does it take evidence to realize that humans are capable of more than the witless rutting of an animal?
Both genders suffer as long as coitus remains unfulfilling to a sentient mind?
Do you need evidence that coitus is not working right for a sentient race?
Are you really satisfied with something less? Does any other way in which to provide mutual satisfaction fulfill you? Do you never wonder what it would be like to share that fulfillment while gazing into the eyes of your lover? Would you avoid it if you knew it was easily possible?
Or, do you believe that it is better to ignore what our sentient awareness has always told us: that there is more to coitus than an animal ever imagined? Do you need evidence to convince you that women like orgasms, also? Don't you think it odd that we have found other ways to seek mutual sexual satisfaction but have never done anything regarding the most natural, loving physical act of sex in a human manner of learning to master one's own body? Don't worry. It's not as big a deal as it sounds. Do you think using a pill, the tongue, or a dildo can substitute for the most natural act of engaging in coitus unassisted? It is surrender. We surrender more each day.
Or, maybe you need more evidence that men can last indefinitely. I do, also. I've provided evidence regarding why men fail to last, an explanation of why ejaculation occurs and how to delay it until she so desires. Nothing will substitute for all men knowing they are good at coitus.
What will it take to prove to you that there is something wrong with a race that hides from the fact that men can't provide the most glorious delight possible in life to his woman through the most natural method that nature provided?
Do you point to fictional accounts of coitus for proof that coitus is okay? Do you discount your own experience? If you are the one that has loving coitus regularly without assistance of any kind, of course, please raise your hand.
The most hilarious part of it all is that we keep it a secret ... from ourselves. It is obvious that, at some level, everyone knows the secret. So, who are we keeping the secret from? The evidence mounts. We are only keeping the secret from ourselves. No mention of the awful secret of humanity will pass our lips. So glad to break the bubble.
How in the world does anyone need proof that something is wrong between the two genders? It is so much like two armed camps as to take one's breath away. Do you need evidence regarding the abuse men heap down on anyone they can, especially women? How about the daily news?
Can you possibly be so dense as to still want to focus on the isolated events, the individual crimes rather than the big picture? We attempt to cope with the problem of the human race by pinning crimes on individuals. It is clear that something is wrong with humanity as a whole. We even know what it is, but we dare not face it. As I look at it from this perspective, I am staggered, once again. Pinning individual crimes on individual people doesn't help with the big picture. It's like a hamster's wheel on which we continue to run.
No, what really stunts a man's humanity is knowing that he's hiding from his failure, hiding from the feeling that he is helpless in the face of his failure, often foolishly believing it is just him. Do you not see this all shows itself blatantly in the conduct of so many men?
The only thing for which I cannot provide proof is that love is initiated in the physical domain and that we really haven't a clue, yet, when it comes to love. We know love, not at all. I think the proof of three thousand years of the failure of willing ourselves into a loving mindset, would be enough for you to, at least, consider the proposal. Animals can't love. Humans can.
The evidence that we have become utterly confused on the topics of sex and love is everywhere.
The proof that the subject of sex is taboo is everywhere.
If I sound acerbic, you've got that right.
The evidence is available and documented regarding the offensive behaviour of men towards women (and in general), though I don't think it is needed, that one in three women are abused, which I am certain is an underestimate, if you define abuse as violence in any form, including verbal, mental, and betrayal. And, the latest, what is now called micro-aggressions, is just further proof that training men only makes the offenses go underground.
Maybe the link between the failure of animal sex to satisfy our heightened awareness and the offensive nature of men towards women is just too much for you. It doesn't really matter, one in three women being abused at some point in their lives is enough to prove something is seriously wrong.
If you have a better suggestion for why this occurs, I am more than willing to listen. Just, don't wave your arms around and say, "men are bad." or "It's just some men." or "It's not only men."
Two armed camps and no one is winning.
We pout our lives away. Should I go through all of the common phrases, once again? "We are only human" is just the top of my list. "That's just the way it is" is right up there. Existentialist despair is another.
Do you need evidence to realize that we can do better at coitus? Do you need evidence to prove that a man would like to satisfy his woman sexually while inside of her?
Does it take evidence to convince you that we are not doing very well as a sentient race? Do you need evidence to be convinced that there should be something more than existentialism? That all of our attempts to become better humans in the past have been for naught?
Do you need evidence that we have been going downhill for quite a few centuries as we thrash around? That we are getting no closer to an emotionally balanced, rational existence and much closer to destroying ourselves?
Do you really believe our human condition is the best we can do? Do you really think laws, and pounding the pulpit is what it takes to become a loving and human race? Do you really believe we are getting any closer to something sentient, loving?
How do I prove that humans are broken because the human race has not raised coitus to a human standard or, at least, identified the dilemma in order to address it seriously?
It sometimes seems that no one can believe we can do extraordinarily better.
The "evidence" is in the fact that there is something wrong with a sexually sentient race that cannot admit that there is more necessary for a sentient version of coitus. It is there in the fact that the mention of sex is taboo. It is there in the fact that men, after three thousand years can do no better than rut. Don't you dare shrug your shoulders.
The strongest evidence of all is that we don't even admit that there is a problem with coitus. That we create fictions that represent fulfilling coitus but never the reality.
We point it out in so many indirect ways but we are never willing to state it outright. The jokes in the sitcoms about the man lasting just long enough to get his rocks off and, then, going directly to sleep.
Any romantic comedy assures you that the woman is satisfied during coitus. The evidence is that it occurs in fiction regularly but not so much in real life (e.g. two minutes versus as long as necessary). If it isn't stated outright in the romcom, it is implied. Only if your own experience with unassisted coitus has been fully satisfactory can you possibly argue. I don't expect to hear any argument on that basis.
It wasn't stupidity that caused us to avoid realizing that something is missing. It was stupour. That is the only possible reason for it to have taken humanity three thousand years to figure it out. The stupour and deceit need to end. That is the heart and soul of our disruption.
Mince the words as you please, we deluded ourselves for reasons I explain elsewhere and the delusions and deceits have extended themselves into every corner of our existence. If you cannot admit that you have bought into a fiction, no amount of "evidence" is going to change your mind.
If you are repulsed by the idea of every man being able to satisfy their lover during coitus, that is evidence of its own. Why else would anyone argue so hard against the idea?
Aaaarrrrgggghhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The completed sentient state is a heightened state of unobstructed awareness. Of course, every living being has some level of awareness.
We exceed the level of awareness of any other life-form on Earth by a long shot. Where we fall short is that our awareness is anything but unobstructed. A huge factor in that obstructive veil is the lack of loving coitus. It may be the only obstructive veil. That is my belief. Once that veil falls for humanity, we begin our journey to becoming Human.
The evidence is overwhelming. I have just touched the surface because there is no getting through to idiots that are committed to the prehuman and those that desire to be Human (if there are any) won't need it.
Modern times evidence
Just look at the movie rating systems. If the movie is full of blood, and gore, and destruction, it is rated PG-13. If it has the slightest innuendo of sex, it is rate R if not X.
To show the body is considered are horror. To show death, blood and gore is just accepting life as it is?
This is another example of an effort to explore the idiocy of a prehuman race that may go on for centuries. I'm just not sure it's worth pinning down any further.
My apologies for the repetitions and anger. This was mostly written while I was still seriously attempting to break though the stupour.
whickwithy@gmail.com
Sentience, Conscious Awareness, and the Trajectory of Life
Before the human race, evolution was exclusively a matter of genetics. With humanity, Nature introduced conscious awareness, which creates an unsurpassed way in which a sentient race can improve itself and everything around it. It is evolution on a sentient scale through application of conscious awareness.
The advent of conscious awareness (sentience) extends the Trajectory of Life and provided a tool to improve and renew life.
So far, it has driven us mad.
Nature has left humanity to evolve itself. Taking the reins, as Nature intended, scares us spitless.
Before humanity, thought was limited. It remained a feeble representation of awareness until the advent of humanity.
Attaining sentience, though, isn't like flipping a switch. The heightened intellect and conscious awareness that comprise our sentience have been developing for hundreds of thousands of years and continues to improve. It is an ongoing effort.
Lofty concepts like love, peace, and noble characteristics can take us into intriguing realms. But, these very human characteristics remain stunted and blunted by the stupour of the animal. Unfettered conscious awareness is necessary for humanity to succeed as a sentient race. Our conscious awareness has remained constrained, befuddled and bewildered.
Conscious awareness allows us to question, "what is?" and extrapolate on "what is" by asking the question, "what can be?" These concepts are further refined by asking the question, "what if?"
So far, we have remained stuck on the idea of "can we?" There is no doubt. We can do whatever we desire, from destroy all life on Earth to mold life on Earth into something tremendous.
These abstract ideas and ideals mean nothing on their own. Reason, which humanity was also gifted, can and should complement the effort. It has yet to even show itself. Irrationality still rules.
If, in the overall scheme of life, an idea is attractive but the results remain tentative, we retain the idea, attempt to refine it, and study its potential and validity versus circumstances.
Concepts, like love, peace, and noble characteristics(e.g. honor, integrity, dignity, grace, elegance, generosity, compassion, etc) have mostly proven unworkable, so far. Though they hold promise, more and more they have become labeled as wishful thinking because our conscious awareness remains handicapped, constrained. Our conscious awareness mostly interprets only what our animal ancestry presents.
Our conscious awareness became increasingly capable around three millennia ago. The circumstances humanity was forced to confront exceeded our capacity to comprehend and adapt as a sentient race at the time. Our intellect was not yet capable of resolving all of the issues that our conscious awareness made apparent.
Often irrationality prevailed. Once accepted, irrational explanations are often extremely difficult to vanquish. Irrationality continues to build on the deceits we told ourselves long ago, warping our existence further, until we can peer through the fog of our past.
Our inability to achieve those higher ideals is due to a single irrationality accepted long ago. "We are only human."
Humanity never gained respect for itself due to a crucial realization of our conscious awareness long before we could interpret it correctly. That has inhibited humanity's sentient ideals.
Our conscious awareness was duped. We became convinced that we are no more than a sophisticated and dangerous animal. In other words, "we are only human", which, once we gain clarity, will be expressed as, "they were only animals."
We remain in a stupour of bewildering proportions.
Our conscious awareness revealed too much too soon. A key link regarding what makes us Human remains missing. Our intellect could not keep up with what our conscious awareness revealed and we never recovered. We learned, in the face of unacceptable circumstances inherited from the animal's state with which we could not yet contend, to use deceit as a tool. The human race blinded itself. The heart was never educated, as Aristotle proposed.
Comprehension, clarification, and guidance of our own existence, due to conscious awareness and reason, are Nature's most powerful tools to lead human, sentient life into unbelievable realms of success, far exceeding genetics.
We remain stunted due to a lingering issue. Our ancestors crafted a thorough scheme of denial, resembling the River Lethe, regarding one most important aspect of sentient existence. We can supersede the animal in more ways than we ever expected.
When we approach the key issue hobbling our sentient awareness, our minds go blank. We avoid the issue at all costs.
We have gone down a long and weary path of developing self-defeating concepts like supernatural beliefs, existentialism, and authoritarianism, persistently denying our own staggering potential.
An animal's reactionary viewpoint, reminiscent of a death wish, utilizes violence to achieve obscure, witless, and meaningless goals. That is defeatism, not sentience.
The break in the chain began when humanity faced an immensely perplexing situation far beyond its initial sentient comprehension and ability to cope and adjust.
Our early ancestors had not yet developed the powers Nature grants a sentient race in the form of knowledge, reason, and intellect. Instead, through imagination and creativity, we obfuscated and blockaded the attainment of a fully functional sentient state.
The curtain of obfuscation has grown to untold proportions over the millennia.
In front of the curtain, we see a demented race. What lies behind the curtain is our Humanity.
Humanity, in its earliest days, was put in the awful position of resolving a seemingly impossible issue or forcing blindness on humanity.
Resolving the issue, at the time, was just not possible. That left obfuscation on a scale that is difficult to imagine. For very important reasons, the dilemma was considered dangerous to contemplate in the absence of resolution.
Sentient awareness never rests. It is always seeking clarity. This is a fundamental aspect of sentience that we have yet to fulfill.
The animal perspective that remained in place frantically obscured our awareness of one particular issue with an animal's existence (versus human, sentient existence).
Our conscious awareness continually pounds against the bars erected to block clarity. The rage experience by every youthful generation is an attempt to break through the nonsense. It took my entire lifetime to do so.
The issue was created when the first form of life engaged in the activity of creating life while only one gender achieved a state of bliss that is obtainable by both genders of a sentient race.
Nature made animal life in such a way that it could exceed the animal's expectations, once it attained a sentient state.
This became apparent due to the conscious awareness provided by a sentient state. The animal perspective of humanity, as long as it remains in an animal state of stupour, just curses knowledge and the sentient state.
The curse on knowledge, first pronounced over two millennia ago, was wrong in every way. It was not knowledge that cursed us. It was lack of knowledge.
Resolution is ridiculously simple to implement, once we free ourselves of the animal and accept the knowledge that transforms us into something truly sentient with conscious awareness free to roam all aspects of a sentient existence.
The issue created by conscious awareness is simply stated. For a sentient race, there are two desires for coitus. Please oneself and please one's mate. The two desires have never consistently converged during coitus because the full capability of a sentient race has never been applied.
The resolution is incredibly simple once the animal's witless blinders are removed.
In the current rendition of coitus, just like an animal, one gains pleasure while the other provides pleasure. That is fine for witless animals. It is an unacceptable predicament for humans of either gender. It wreaks havoc on everything regarding the sentient state.
Men take, women give, and it begins in bed. We are trained in such a way from the point of puberty. It need not remain that way. Human resolution is clear and straightforward.
We remain a demented animal out of sorts with our Human potential. Our Humanity requires that the animal act of rutting become the human act of loving.
The only complete resolution is when the unassisted act of creating life also becomes an act that creates love by sharing the incredible, transcendent gift that the act of coitus can provide for both genders. The act only creates love when the transcendental gift is shared. Anything less is not worthy of a human, sentient race.
Both genders suffer in its absence in different ways. Our concept of love remains warped and damaged because of the lack.
Can you begin to see how this would have confounded our ancestors? They were at a loss for resolution and, yet, coitus had to continue. They handed down their bewilderment and defeat, generation by generation. With each generation, we became more convinced that there was nothing to be done.
Men can easily overcome what has seemed an insurmountable barrier to our ancestors who clamped down so hard on the matter that exploration remained impossible for millennia (see Details or Explanations). It is just a matter of mastering certain muscles. Do not confuse that with strengthening muscles.
Humanity works best by consensus and the gathering of forces applied to an issue. Coitus is the only aspect of life that humanity has been unwilling to reach consensus because we could not accept or condone the way in which it is enacted by an animal and, yet, for the sake of the continued existence of the race, the act must go on, under any conditions.
That is the dilemma which our ancient ancestors were forced to confront without the full knowledge and awareness that were just beginning to develop. The results of the last three millennia, in the absence of loving coitus, are not even a surprise.
We twisted the situation and ourselves into knots because we were convinced that men could not succeed. The silent implication was that men were undeserving of a sentient state. We mistakenly accepted the conclusion that we are no better than an animal at the most important act of sentient life relegating ourselves to a monstrous existence beyond the bounds of the animal but far from the vistas of sentience and unobstructed conscious awareness.
Transforming coitus into loving act transforms humanity into a fully sentient race. It frees us from the shackles of the animal entirely.
Transforming the life-creating act of coitus is the missing piece of the puzzle to fulfill our humanity.
The lack has induced the human race's emotional upheaval and, through obfuscation which resulted in a state of stupour, impeded our conscious awareness, reason, and fulfillment as a sentient race since the very beginning.
The phrase make love has meaning. Rutting is not making love, it obviates a fully shared experience for both genders.
Loving coitus is the crucial aspect of the Trajectory of Life that allows a sentient race to take the reins of its existence into its own hands as its conscious awareness can finally fully awaken without obstruction.
Love and the nobler qualities are the natural result of a fully functional sentient life. We cannot strive for them. They are not an effort of conscious will, as we have attempted for three millennia.
Love an noble qualities are inherent in a fully sentient state of existence. They are the first steps along the extended Trajectory of Life provided by unobstructed sentient, conscious awareness of life.
Our dystopia is a by-product of the stupour that is eliminated with ease by a race in command of its sentience as it begins to direct the Trajectory of Life for its own benefit.
It is not utopia. It is stable emotions, rational thought, conscious awareness, and reason transforming our higher ideals into actuality as sentient awareness gains its mastery of life by succeeding at the act of love. It is human.
Men were undone by the misbelief that a certain aspect of their sentient existence was beyond their measure.
Nature provided all that is required for a man to achieve loving coitus with ease. It only requires our sentient capability of conscious muscle control. It is explained, to some extent, in Details or Explanations (which is in a number of books. The latest, Explanations, is on the website noted below, as well).
Noble characteristics will appear in full force once the male gender gains its sentient confidence and self-respect.
The obfuscation of the situation began over three millennia ago due to the bewilderment of a newly minted sentient race that became consciously aware of something that was beyond their knowledge to correct.
The obfuscation became a force of its own over the long millennia as it was inadvertently and subliminally embellished to counter our growing conscious awareness. It is the disturbing thought that we dared not confront. Only the cowering, witless fear that there is nothing to be done holds us back today.
The Trajectory of Life has now crossed the threshold to a creature that should be seeking the limits of its own potential.
With human consciousness, we have the potential for love, rational thought, and mastery of life. That is far beyond the bounds of any animal. There is a lot yet to learn about love.
As I ponder all of this, it seems that, once the dam bursts, the flood of our unconstrained thoughts will clear away the underbrush in short order.
Even this transformation into a race that can think and love unfettered does not seem the end of the line for the Trajectory of Life.
It is more like beginning to apply the tools Nature provided to reach the next level of the Trajectory of Life, whatever that might be.
As is my druthers, that makes me ache to know what is on the other side. What tremendous vistas does this open?
It will be humanity's first step into the domain of conscious evolution.
It brings a smile to my face when I contrast it to our current mindless revolution approach to life.
This is a branching point of life in which infinity splits. The split infinity begins with success at being sentient.
We will finally begin to utilize the human tools rather than the animal's hand-me-downs to follow the Trajectory of Life into the future rather than the past.
https://sentienceww.blogspot.com
This still seems a bit advanced for a novice Human but it is too critical to avoid and may be just as difficult to accept as loving coitus.